Articles by this Attorney:
- Insurers Temporarily Required to Pay Defense Costs for Stanford Financial Executives
- Insurers Granted Temporary Reprieve From Payment of Stanford Legal Fees
- Insurers Required to Defend Stanford Financial Executives
- Cadmium in Children Toys and Jewelry Has Immediate and Long Term Litigation Potential
- Supreme Court Holds that Orders Requiring Disclosure of Material Allegedly Protected by The Attorney-Client Privilege are Not Immediately Appealable
- PENNSYLVANIA FEDERAL COURT HOLDS THAT REMOVAL OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE FROM UIM COVERAGE IS GROUNDS FOR STATUTORY BAD FAITH CLAIM
- Third Circuit Extends Sackett II To Enforce A Stacking Waiver Initially Signed Under A Single Vehicle Policy To Additional Vehicles
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court Rejects Argument that Prejudice Is Required Before Denial of Coverage for Late Notice in Claims-Made Policy
- Examining Expert Retained By Defendant Can Be Called by Plaintiff in Absence of Prohibition in Expert's Retention Contract
- THIRD CIRCUIT REDUCES PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN BAD FAITH CASE TO A 1:1 RATIO: January, 2009
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court overrules Superior Court decision in Generette: October, 2008
- Pa. Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Challenge to No Prejudice Requirement for Late Notice in Claims Made Policy: October, 2008
- Oregon Supreme Court Says "4-to-1" Ratio on Punitive Damages for Bad Faith: March, 2008
- Pennsylvania Superior Court Declines to Extend Notice-Prejudice Requirement to "Claims Made" Policies: February, 2008
- The Stacking Provisions of The MVFRL Do Not Apply To Commercial Fleet Policies:January, 2008
- Supreme Court Focuses on Negligence of Insured in Determining That Occurrence Policy Provides Coverage for Intentional Acts of a Third Party: January, 2008
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court Clarifies Previous Holding on Uninsured and Underinsured Motorist Waivers: January, 2008
- Pennsylvania Supreme Court Agrees to Review Issue of Whether an Insured can Recover Both Disability Benefits and UIM Coverage Under the MVFRL: December, 2007
- Pennsylvania State Supreme Court Refuses to Apply Bad Faith Statute to the Sale of an Insurance Policy: August, 2007
- Failure to Make Partial Payment Does Not Constitute Bad Faith Under Pennsylvania Law: June, 2007
- California Court Reduces $290 Million Punitive Award: December, 2003
